Reset


Reference type filter

  1. Limits of victim participation in adversarial and non-adversarial systems. A case study of Germany and Australia Contribution
    Braun, Kerstin (2019)
    In: Braun, Kerstin (Eds.), Victim participation rights. Variation across criminal justice systems, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, (Palgrave studies in victims and victimology, ), pp. 203-232
  2. Nothing but the truth? Some facts, impressions and confessions about truth in criminal procedure Contribution
    Jung, Heike (2014)
    In: Duff, Antony (Eds.), Truth and due process, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp. 147-156
  3. Plea bargaining in Germany after the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court Journal Article
    Safferling, Christoph J.M.; Hoven, Elisa (2014)
    In: German Law Journal, 15(1), pp. 1-4
  4. Giving victims a voice. On the problems of introducing victim impact statements in German criminal procedure Journal Article
    Braun, Kerstin (2013)
    In: German Law Journal, 14(9), pp. 1889-1908
  5. Informal settlements in Germany Contribution
    Rauxloh, Regina (2012)
    In: Rauxloh, Regina (Eds.), Plea bargaining in national and international law, Routledge, London, pp. 61-105
  6. The public prosecution's role in criminal proceedings under the rule of law. Legal situation in Germany with comparative law remarks on UK and USA Book
    Krey, Volker (2009)
    Institut für Rechtspolitik an der Universität Trier, Trier
  7. The "adversarial" procedure: A model superior to other trial systems in international criminal justice? : Reflexions of a judge Contribution
    Eser, Albin (2008)
    In: Kruessmann, Thomas (Eds.), ICTY towards a fair trial?, NWV, Wien, (Recht. Symposium, ), pp. 206-227
  8. The decay of the inquisitorial ideal. Plea bargaining invades German criminal procedure Contribution
    Weigend, Thomas (2008)
    In: Jackson, John (Eds.), Crime, procedure and evidence in a comparative and international context. Essays in honour of Professor Mirjan Damaška, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp. 39-64