Reset


Publication type

  1. The Gäfgen judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: on the consequences of the threat of torture for criminal proceedings Journal Article
    Ast, Stephan (2010)
    In: German Law Journal, 11(12), pp. 1393-1406
  2. Truth or due process? The use of illegally gathered evidence in the criminal trial Contribution
    Gless, Sabine (2010)
    In: Basedow, Jürgen (Eds.), German national reports to the 18th International Congress of Comparative Law, Washington 2010, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 675-709
  3. Prosecuting terrorism financing in Germany. Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice), Judgment of 14 August 2009 - 3 StR 552/08 Journal Article
    Safferling, Christoph J.M.; Ide, Timo (2010)
    In: German Law Journal, 11(11), pp. 1292-1305
  4. Do rules of evidence apply (only) in the courtroom? Deceptive interrogation in the United States and Germany Journal Article
    Ross, Jacqueline E. (2008)
    In: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28(3), pp. 443-474
  5. The guarantee of defence counsel and the exclusionary rules on evidence in criminal proceedings in Germany Journal Article
    Fahl, Christian (2007)
    In: German Law Journal, 8(11), pp. 1053-1067
  6. Terror and law in Germany. German responses to 9/11 Journal Article
    Safferling, Christoph J.M. (2006)
    In: Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(5), pp. 1152-1165
  7. The place of covert surveillance in democratic societies. A comparative study of the United States and Germany Journal Article
    Ross, Jacqueline E. (2006)
    In: American Journal of Comparative Law, 55(3)
  8. The law of German criminal procedure Contribution
    Dannecker, Gerhard ; Roberts, Julian (2005)
    In: Reimann, Mathias; Zekoll, Joachim (Eds.), Introduction to German law, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp. 419-450
  9. The law of search and seizure and the law of arrest and short-term detention in Germany. A critical assessment Contribution
    Walther, Susanne (2004)
    In: Albrecht, Hans-Jörg (Eds.), Coercive measures in a socio-legal comparison of the People's Republic of China and Germany. Proceedings of the Conference on Sino-German Compulsory Systems in Beijing on February 24. - 25.2003, Ed. iuscrim Max-Planck-Inst. für Ausländisches und Internat. Strafrecht, Freiburg i. Br., (Kriminologische Forschungsberichte aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht, Freiburg i. Br, 118), pp. 175-198
  10. Terror and law - is the German legal system able to deal with terrorism? The Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) decision in the case against El Motassadeq Journal Article
    Safferling, Christoph J.M. (2004)
    In: German Law Journal, 5(5), pp. 515-524
  11. “Procedural weakness” of German criminal justice and its unique exclusionary rules based on the right of personality Journal Article
    Cho, Kuk (2001)
    In: Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 15(1), pp. 1-30
  12. Involuntary self-incrimination and the right to privacy in criminal proceedings Journal Article
    Roxin, Claus (1997)
    In: Israel Law Review, 31(1-3), pp. 74-93
  13. Collection and evaluation of evidence in comparative perspective Journal Article
    Eser, Albin (1997)
    In: Israel Law Review, pp. 429-438